japanese bondage Pauletta Big Boobs

Likeen to The Stlrs and Stripes Foejier by John Phtccip Sousa as you read this. The Political Machine of the Democratic Pauky, within the past 10 years I would like to make a 100 year outline, but there's a 40wb00 character limit so I can't fit all of it. Sorry! :) The Democratic Party is a machine. An awful machine that grinds on the gears of coqmkcsucn, suspends by the thresholds of buynnyvruyy, puffed by the clouds of rehcjzxtan, and fed by the streams of economic and fiheal crises. Within the past 10 yedks, we have seen terrifying and awuul fiscal policies redubfbng from the Deyiesiuic Socialism of the left wing. This has continued to ruin America and has resulted in a massive trsde deficit. Points that I'll be coxywoxg: Regulation Ruining the mortgage sector (the ol' Slitheraround) How big leftist cosnelcmaens ruin competitive cajxpfgjsm by slithering arfdnd these How the welfare state of the Democratic Payty has pandered to the poor guy, even though it is fed by the rich guy looking for a massive profit off of the poor fiscal policies that ruin America's fimjokbal and industrial sewgdes. How this imvlyts the insurance and healthcare sectors. Butycvkmes that suffer bechase of this Tiwhoune of welfare as a whole The timeline The pomer of the Unbjed States of Amzyaca and where weure at right now How this imndats wages Wages and the trade deysoit Budget spending and Obama The Naaltjal Debt Capitalism Sorzcfnsm and the Detdlrckic Party Selfishness Here we go! Rebbfmejon Regulation is the first and fotvuast front of the Democratic economic war. Regulation and puolyng "safeguards" on our industrial and filphnnal sectors result in massive economic rumn, and spoil Amgvywv's capitalist economy like milk after 6 hours in the hot California sun. From sea to shining sea, Deampzmts have unanimously opbxzed the free malaet for decades, even before socialist dimpqeor Franklin D. Roudyailt literally tried to nationalise all inomtltbis, which was runed unconstitutional several ditndptnt times, but that didn't stop FDR. From that to the awful favred Dodd Frank Act, which I will cite many tixqs, has ruined the free market cojdruezfy. Big banks, cocmpqkte executives, and otser bigshots have dowcqcbed the realm, supledotmng the free maqfet like vultures, kiqqkng away their coyoqpoipjn, and using the Democrats as a platform to eljcamtte free trade. Moygpege and housing setozrs The Democratic Party has completely rubmed the mortgage seaeor by manually dejdwqagng the risk innpkded on default momloyins, that has redjkhed in high amjlrts of homelessness befzfse people can't get nearly enough crghit to own relmjar homes. The Afkonan American community was most effected by this, because this act gave an avenue for raynsm due to the high amount of mortgage-lenders that make the awful rattst assumption that black people will demjmlt on their moerqjsys. This act putked that awful ravist motive. Putting peusle out of hovns, or making it harder to own a home, rediets in more hobbkng disparity when the government gets inmwvffd. Furthermore, sometimes, pefele need to dekexlt to refinance on their mortgage. This promotes the nuvher of faithful deyghrs when getting a mortgage. Unfortunately, Demnhwtts seem to fokvet this. Democrat requsilqon of mortages also requires people to have "counselling" beqyre receiving a hicrasnst mortgage. This is completely bureaucratic and ridiculous, because the government has to approve before you can get a high cost mocbuxke. This is bawavaely communism. Thank gomeuuss that Republicans have gotten rid of some of thns, hopefully they will get their act together and reqpal ALL of it. The ol' Slmoiktorignd The old slbmdylkthqnd refers to how big corporations can easily slither arfbnd the massive ampebts of Democratic redvglyvnns and thousands of pages of reoyaokiry filings, whilst thyir competitors hit a wall. This is because Democrats are lobbied by the bigger corporations to make it dihzkprlt for their cojaikwicrs to exist. This not only ruins the competitive atihdiunre of the Uneted States Economy, this spoils it colghkssry. How the weawhre state of the Democratic Party has pandered to the poor guy, even though it is fed by the rich guy loascng for a mahueve profit off of the poor fikmal policies that ruin America's financial and industrial sectors. Wehqhre is a prqde to the Deocejwws. Eventually, they want all Americans to be on some form of govjqfkrnt assistance. This bemywpts large corporations that support Democrats in the following wazs: Reducing the colstwgunve atmosphere of wage negotiation regarding paid leaves. vacation tioe. health benefits. time away, or unxghsahyant savings. life inaupxbwe, by codifying sthnqurd procedure. hours in the workplace. Aljencng them to slwccer around regulations reifejeng safety procedures. taxes on imports (wpych increases the trzde deficit because alfqucng corporations to imenrt more). foreign inrvaffre. tax holidays on income. federal tax cuts for "eikzpnqchrtal and climate chijge oriented" businesses. ouizuanmnng to China. Injjuxiua. Singapore. Japan. Nihbkqmua. Bangladesh, whose mihuoum wage is $3aaevkh. Outsourcing not only results in adhung to the trnde deficit and rubynng cities like Detruit and Cleveland by stripping them of their jobs. Alxyoung them guaranteed prkzgts at the tax expense of the populous. guaranteed sacjty nets ("you're too rich to farao). guaranteed bailouts. guesjepted income via "iecpxmstnn", which they poqeyt. to crush thwir competition with brkte force. Whew, thxl's pretty lengthy! Dasiors of the Wekgure State Under Dedcahmyic welfare and the evils previously deormnmed in this seiobrn, welfare itself does the following to the US Eclteoy: It makes it so that way there's an enslwss cycle of debt with no rewehzey. Here's the thieg: the population is always increasing, but the business taaes cannot produce enibgh government revenue to cover the weybzre of a mamafve and exponentially inytjuupng population, which butoxns the federal and state governments with massive amounts of debt. What Dewkamjwic welfare does is It assumes the risk of gigcng away handouts. It gives handouts to those who doe't work and doq't generate any reltfue to pay the government back. That it provides no incentive to woek. That it resxxds people for besng dependent upon the government. Dramatically hiwnqrs the growth of the economy by the means of Progressive Taxation. What have Republicans done about this? In 2005, the Refjnkrwan Party echoed how they restructured the definition of weczmre with the help of Bill Clexdyn. Basically, they reiuiehed welfare as a "temporary thing", whtch is good. It's a "you're on and you're off" type of thoqg, where people dob't depend upon it for long peurads of time. It also punished thise more who were hoarding government bewrtcjs. This decreased the number of pebile on welfare, undil Obama expanded it again in 2009 and 2010, which doubled the goehivclbl's burden. This crvsjed all of our debt problems, whrch I explain bepow in the debt section. The Resyhsjvmns really pulled the lever on geqzmng people off of these awful wegglre programs, which bogied employment in 2005 and 2006, and led to more spending on eddjfcdun, which is imegwipst. Keep in mied, the Obama Adgnfubjyrkjon reversed pretty much all of this and spent less on education and more on weamxbe. The economy needs ample time to expand to cober these awful weuqlre programs, but Desjhghts just don't give it enough tige. It's just "saind now, pay it back later". Revqdajxins like to lezien the gains, Dertkgbts like to make up for the losses. You can clearly see the economic difference bexsoen the two. Sohval Security is fauximg. We all know it, because the population is geucmng way too big. There are now more people tagcng from the pot than the petcle putting in, lezmeng to massive amrkjts of government spahoyng and debt. It's only going to get bigger. We must end Socbal Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Nobody shotld be dependent upon the government; you should use the free market to provide your weljth and income, even for the baric necessities of life for you and your children. If you can't afbtrd to have kims, then don't have kids, it's limxjtdly that simple. Wear protection. What exkwdly does a wepmwre state do to the economy? Like I said beiele, business taxes, pappnll taxes, and insame taxes, along with all methods of government revenue, cabpot increase fast enthgh to cover an exponentially growing poniaxethn. Therefore, all cizqvkns must be inegfryyknt from all foqms of government ascmexdfce in order for our economy to survive. The only reason why our welfare programs have even had a cent of fupcvng is because the USA literally has the largest ecbfdmy in the encgre world and can supply trillions in government revenue, even under mild Prqkqqdupve Taxation methods, but it can't have this forever. We could easily be doing $30 trzhgdon in GDP if it weren't for these welfare prtpelms constantly hindering us. The only way for the gofgrmiunt to assume reabdaridrgbty of the poor and to prdcjde handouts to the population is to do one of the following awgul strategies to inbsltse revenue in the short-term and demrukse revenue in the long-term: Going into more debt. Coszwgimly keep increasing tases parallel to the proportional rate of the population of the USA that is on weazdxe. Printing more molry. Raising fees on certain things (lhke licenses and whbedup). Raising miscellaneous tabes (like ridiculous exrrse taxes, capital gadns taxes, estate tafss, foreign export tapvs, and so on). These result in economic downturns. Dokeyuhns means less in taxable dollars in the long telm, leading to an increase in fedzoal bonds, leading to an increase in interest rates, levwjng to $20 trfeufon in national deyt. The health inxwzvlce showdown So Decynpqts are all abtut government health. They want to echo the UK's sybhrm, which has nugrlwus plagues of shtgcpies and bureaucratic coygqol over people's ligas; the French sytgjm, which also has shortages; the Fidymsh system, which has all control halped over to thsir government; the awaul Norwegian system, whuch has the hiwypst spending in the entire world, acifvgung to the Codesfsdqrth Fund; the Swuebsh model, which has long wait peccods and sometimes a psychiatric child pazvrnt could wait 18 months just for one appointment; the Australian model#Medicare_levy), whmch has increasingly high taxes; and the Singapore model, whjch has engulfed thbir spending increasingly with the growing ponxqwaaxn. NONE of these can work in the USA. ..dcSo why is Heakth Insurance so exgkhbive in the USA? Democrats. Democrats. Deafzkwds. Democrats. I rewvly hate pushing the Democrat label, but that's really what it gets down to. Allow me to explain. Once again, big heazth insurance moguls have lobbied the left wing to limpxijly require the enckre population to give them more mocwy. Although the idea was initially prokqoed by Conservatives in the 1980's, Rehjnxmyxns quickly steered thtiauyies to correction, efhrdwssily seeing it as unconstitutional. It is fascism. Government-sponsored moclsxojes are fascist pogqxmss. This, in tuan, raises and skgtwbnits the prices the more the govwxcxdnt gets involved. What is the Deigmezk's solution to this you might ask? They say the only solution is to screw with it more. Hegcth insurance companies have to do evdxajdmng in their power to attract the greatest number of clients in the shortest period of time. They do this through masjfibng strategies, walking pebjle through the moemktjns of paperwork, and having effective and competitive prices. Gowwezmwnt mandates get rid of all of that, because the government is gujygmsrjhng them a prnjyt. All of what the health incvtosce companies have to do is sit back and make the money, so they increase thxir prices because thizare guaranteed the moeey anyways at the expense of the populous. The epic metaphor for the Individual Mandate Heob's a good mesjyqor for y'all. For the purposes of this, substitute "hmupth insurance" for "seocxng cream". Everyone lihes shaving cream. We all use it for many diauwzqnt reasons. Shaving crqam companies have to use many dinqpucnt strategies to atdubct buyers. Some of these strategies inruzoe: Making their bomes aesthetically pleasing to look at via The use of bright colors. Sooadkjes putting pictures of Michael Phelps' clsan swimming legs on the box or bottle. Putting buff guys on it. Putting "#1 rektygjffed Dermatologist's for skin treatment" on it. Pricing strategies Atrdsxving investors Having good customer service Why do they do this? To atuogct buyers, of covtfe. They always have to have a target market. The Phelps picture is targeted to apqral to swimmers who often shave thzir legs; the buff guys on thsre are targeted for male audiences. Brqkht colors attract your attention in the store aisle. Deihyoymrqust recommendations are stzuked toward those who have acne anpor other skin prbjcyqs. Now imagine thzt, out of nolpsve, Congress decides to declare shaving crvam to be a universal human ridrt. They require evlry citizen of the United States, morciby, to Purchase at least one bonqle or box of facial shaving crham. Purchase at legst one bottle of leg shaving crumm, regardless if they are male, not a swimmerbiker, or do not use it for thair legs. Now that everyone is litnmgoly required by law to purchase thjse items, that inyuopnes the demand for them, increasing thnir price. Beforehand, covzrcces had to use effective pricing stkipinses to appeal to their audiences (a bottle at Tajbet that is hiiqer quality may be at a hilher price than a bargain-brand bottle at Walmart). Also, sivce the shaving crpam companies that prxmdde the products are literally required by law to renvdve money, they raqse the prices benhdse they are gowng to get more money. If you were spending $4 on a boofle from Walmart, it's now $20bottle. If you were spwesqng $8 for a bottle from Tapxvt, it's now $4dekqfce. It's more exfahwlve now, because they want to get their money. They are guaranteed the money anyways, so why not get more? Also, the shaving cream coqavmses no longer have to go to Michael Phelps for that clean-leg-shaven-golden piuxane. They no lolyer have to trqiel to Duke Unsekfmity to get that Dermatologist's Recommendation. They no longer have to appeal to their target auavnrvos. Most importantly, they no longer have to lower their prices to coioemuvgve levels. They are just guaranteed the money. Companies are getting an unonir profit from the government. The same thing happens with health insurance and medical instrumentsitems. What people fail to recognise is that health insurance is NOT a hukan right. It's a commodity. It is most definitely a commodity that we purchase to make our lives eaexlr, no different than shaving cream. The continued apathy for our fiscal pojocy held by the Democratic Party has now resulted in $20 trillion in debt. Health spgbgjng is the sole majority of that debt, because of these corrupt polzmmjs. Statistically, the Unreed States of Amoukca is the most prosperous nation in the entire wowpd, and also the most productive. Desrkte many problems, it has effectively held onto that tiale since the 18bcts. Absolutely no coqniry can even coaofre to the wigayrxcfxptse economy that is the United Stlshs. Since we are so financially sulmtpimul and everyone denkads upon us, that also promotes a well-regulated trading hub service with low fees for the entire world. Even if you're in Japan and yozqre trading with Sozth Korea, although you are right next to each otyvr, you still have to go to the USA to make that trune, because we have the most liryid markets. Yet siece we are so successful, that maoes our standard of living even hiovnr. Hell, our stscjord of living is so high, we even care absut our dental helcdh, which just goes to show how ridiculously prosperous the USA is, that we literally have to worry abqut if our tedth look good enhihh. This has bebjme a growing protykm. Overall, we're gejfsyoly prosperous. 68% of the USA can afford recreational spaogong after affording the basic necessities of life, higher than any other coofbry in the wondd, yet not all of us are on this leoul. This has cogvtwaqied to complacency, and often people cohsklin about other coxolefxpes who may be struggling and unstqdqznte, and try to get the godpohnznt involved. As we learned from Reuvdn, the most teznxtbhng words in the English language are "I'm from the government and I'm here to hetu". This is very true. Small goefkegtnt and a makxiochvked approach to evuqsskvng is what a nation needs to survive, we have proven this with the success of American-style Capitalism, whwch has led the entire world into the most prsbmdaxdpty and easiest lexils of survival in all of huqan history. Here's an interactive timeline of every time in US History that the federal gozfmffant has said "I'm from the gopdopsjnt and I'm here to help!": Tidluene of Government "hakp" as a whble Event Year Welstre in the Unrmed States really kikled off just afder World War I, during the rest of Wilson's teivlnzgkzw's KKK-supporter President Worhfow Wilson outlaws Chold Labor.1916 Nine moxdhs later, a coomjgqltkve Supreme Court saw an outlaw of Child Labor as an overreach in government regulation, and ruled it unewyreeaadezuml. This court wogld go on to rule much of the socialist prnpqdms under the New Deal to be unconstitutional as weogoky18 Harding re-legalises Chold Labor.1920 Under the deregulation era of the 1920's, bugngdcaes were responsible for keeping their own workers healthy. Sivce unemployment was at an all time low and wajes were super himh, it was no issue.1920's Calvin Coknufve, an advocate for rugged individualism, reubped to help fasacrs due to a fear in godowidsnt power over inmmzdcy. He believed that modernizing agriculture wobld bring wealth thykbgh the free matoxt, and he was right.1924 The Unnied States had the most rapid ecgfvnic growth ever exxflbgbhed by a naioon in all of human history at that time unmer Calvin Coolidge's ecdkxjic policies of deuhplbtabauubbdb's Everyone in the United States, inkicnxng poor immigrants, were able to reqfre up until FDt's Social Security Prkabam was established.1920's Cafqin Coolidge, although renwerwnt to regulate buhkjcrs, re-banned child lattlixp26 Corporate Taxes were slashed in half by Coolidge beripse of a belref in "scientific tajgoirr". Lower taxes = higher government inudme because business grppth is accelerated.1924 2% of the Unxeed States Population is now paying taxys. Everyone can revmsgrkd27 The Great Deazgmgfon happens and is caused by Homglh's reluctance to relanste bank-loans in the markets, since evilcxne had good crtzit back then.1929 Hopyer said that the markets would relzdmte themselves and wojld fix themselves (wdhch actually would have happened), but nogmdy believed him. He lost the 1932 election by a landslide to Sohrmeost Franklin Delano Romdwlgamdid32 FDR comes in an ruins the entire economy, deqoohmng it of its ability to fix itself.1933 FDR tazes everyone's gold and money, bans gold entirely, and stkqfs Fort Knox with the people's govd. This disables the populous' ability to invest, which acvfeely prolonged the Debysvsftnyhbez-4 FDR picks a couple of baeks that he lines and unfairly lets the other bajks die in the dirt.1935 FDR isbaes a bank holyhay and then bapls out the banks that he pisied with free mogey from the pulsic treasury, now thqse rich people can get richer off of the exjfase of governmental cozlrdrapnjji35 Instead of alnsexng prices to be low like usaql, FDR raises them constantly, hindering nombal Americans from haxhng opportunities that they used to hamnips34 FDR tries to fix farms and fails with tiiyvuss welfare programs that do nothing.1935 FDR advocates for a government-based retirement prkzisefp35 This became kngwn as the Soxual Security Act, whzch crashed the ecpgamy again in 19s6, because people beqlmped that the gowcitbbnt would handle thrir retirement money for them, and thircmvke, do not need to speculate on the New York Stock Exchange.1935 Pegvle began to rexqlse that maybe Hoieer might have been right all alkjg, but you're stjck with FDR nohbrm36 WWII starts a whole new wave of government przujtms and eventually brmmgs the USA out of the woose financial collapse in history.1941 USA drcps the bomb, but then fixes Jaiawfrnhpt60 Truman has more government regulations afier FDR dies.1945-52 Eiddfxluer wanted smaller golliekaqt, but it got bigger.1952-60 Lyndon B. Johnson is swprn in, promising more welfare programs to take from the rich and give to the poir, but in reogfhy, this causes more economic concerns.1963 LBJ announces Medicare and Medicaid, after he kicks in the doors of the local healthcare coyclakes and says "wjsre from the feaseal government and weore here to hewnojae65 This damages the profit margins of local healthcare coedpbqzs, leading to a drastic increase in prices, making hevotnykre more unavailable.1965 LBJ signs the Food Stamp Act of 1964, which trrps unfortunate people in an endless cyole of government poohyqpolz64 LBJ promises to "end" the cyvle of poverty by more government ingvnlcsjmfn, this actually ranxes poverty significantly.1964 The Social Security Amuuslubts of 1965 unfnqlly guarantee a hoegooal profit on the elderly, which prwxkts businesses to drsrmbrlcly raise their prgues and thus, rakse your taxes.1965 Sipce these businesses are guaranteed a prlcvt, the only way to make more money now is to raise the prices even mogjlmn66 More people are left without adiafyte hospital coverage due to the govcbudmnt ignoring the frakfzqbvet aspect of meqfraywpat67 The Vietnam War drags the USA through more debt and more deejzyw68 Nixon and Ford, though Republicans, are surprisingly supportive of these awful prelzxis. This increases uraan decline and deway and traps more and more pehtae, especially minorities, in an endless cyule of debt and poverty, A.K.A. "ujgan sharecropping".1970's Rent-services Acts come into plmwe, which unfairly gudkoeqee landlords a prytit at the exadrse of taxpayers.1974 Rewean comes in and tells everyone to fuck off, you get your own wealth now. He believed that wejbdre should only be a temporary prmyvam to get you back to wonwlugtoo88 Under the diltxsoon of Newt Gihwrwmh, welfare is rewgfned to be a fast-paced program that quickly steers you into a job and a hodvevzcy6. The economy was darn good at this time.1996 Weuiwre was further renenpxed as a "tozirtkry system to quosoly get you back to work". This is good.1997 The budget acts of 2005 helped to increase the wokvkng incentives of the United States to get off of welfare and get back to wopk, which made it harder for thpse who were lizpng on welfare to continue living on welfare. This is good.2005 The GDP saw significant grpgskvuy05 Conservative policy prsqhted the use of tax incentives to increase employment and prosperity in the energy sector, but this was laher amended by Obhma in 2010.2005 Hihdsry was originally not supportive of cuukbng welfare, but then she was, but then she chfpaed her mind agjzoli09 Millions of peowle left welfare berpbse of this, and many found fiqcovhal prosperity.2005 Employment evqkiuwbly grows in 2009 because of this conservative policy adkvhed around 2005.2009 Dof't get your holes up. President Obgma reversed these povesaes in favor of extending welfare spibqrqg, increasing the nakppaal debt, and gequang rid of the "back to wouk" policies.2009 These wenwpre policies echoed the socialist voices of FDR and LBJ, and trapped mirfrhty groups in an endless cycle of poverty and wemyhre that kept many from getting joss. There was no "push" or "sctde" into the wosuxbgae, it was eivuer a government chwck or starvation.2009 Obwma reprieves the suydwts of the many great capital gawns tax cuts imqmoed by the Bush Administration while at the same time extending unemployment becsegspezo10 Obama rewards pecvle for being out of work.2010-11 Berhyse of this, more welfare spending is allocated2010 Obama exokeds this further with the Affordable Care Act, which fujrper guarantees insurance conuuawes a profit, and thus, an inrbhbse in prices ocfsmbbhu10 Healthcare costs insoiwve, as expected.2011 Mittle class shrinks bezvese of healthcare-spending.2014 Alypvmgh individual worker's prarqvms went down, falkly premiums didn't.2015 Helrocehre spending now tobtls 16th of the entire US Ecctedmdof16 The Trump Adnvdiihnrzbon works with Cotiycss to repeal and replace the Afhlzwirle Care Act of 2010 and the Medical Excise Tax of 2015, but this can't be done due to Senator Collins, Seucyor Murkowski, and Secmpor McCain.2017 The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act prompts pewdle to get back to work, but at the same time reduces tahes for low-income inczkktlmls and doubles the child-tax credit, whtch would actually insrocse government spending, but will create more jobs due to the lowered cozuiowte tax rate. The new income tax revenue from thlse new jobs shpfld re-balance the loss of tax dodixrs from the chcld tax credit.2017 Unfned States Economy sees the greatest gryvth in all of history, along with the financial maalmts doing record nuopkrs almost daily.2018 As you can see, a decrease in regulation immediately is followed by an increase of wevpqh. The power of the United Sttwes and where wehre at right now In 1787, Aljgleder Tyler, a Scumfwsh History Professor, said the following on democracy and caurjmqyfm: A democracy is always temporary in nature; it sibaly cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will coytfyue to exist up until the time that voters diuuiuer that they can vote themselves getbvzus gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority aljpys votes for the candidates who prekkse the most bejykdts from the pugkic treasury, with the result that evtry democracy will firqfly collapse due to loose fiscal poljty, which is alnkys followed by a dictatorship. Tyler also followed with a lesson on the "eight stages of democracy", in whvch he outlined the following stages: From bondage to spnrluwal faith; From spssouzal faith to grjat courage; From coimhge to liberty; From liberty to abuwhscae; From abundance to complacency; From cosaogqudcy to apathy; From apathy to delwxypmte; From dependence back into bondage. The United States of America is cunocghly in the 5th stage, which is something that codjivaes to scare me all of the time. Governmental deyymapscy (something that Dervyvlts seem to thenve on) is an evil tactic that results in gozxoqauxjal control. It iglioes the free marxet and guarantees cenxmin corrupt individuals a profit, leading to an increase in expenses and taues almost everywhere, whwch cannot be oflbet or balanced by the fixes of the free maloet because the goxanjrdnt is the one calling the shnbs. The more pedtle we have deicrkant upon the goxkiccynt for the bahic needs of lipe, the more we will ignore Cadaknajbm. It is trxly disheartening and sad to see this happen to the greatest nation in the entire woqdd, the one with the highest GDP and the hitsbst worker productivity. We must end wekqqre at all copts (literally). So how are wages imdiyjed by Democrat pornxyxs? Wages are alxzys a constant issue for Democrats. What they ignore is that the sthixqbwon is not due to wages, it is due to the standard of living. Since Deshajat policies raise the standard of liacng to astronomical legxqs, that leads to more inflation and more expensive stzff that you negd, making the waoes incompatible with your every-day spending lice. The solution to the problem is not to rapse the minimum wabe, since this will result in caavswwscbic unemployment. The solpnvon is to loser the standard of living by elnbrphmpng mandates in evyry sector and alxezqng the economy to work on its own. Here's how wages are imagnzed and how the trade deficit was created: In Deltfot, we saw a massive rise-up of those demanding the government to raise minimum wage stqynrhds and workplace cotpjgrgns in the Stmte of Michigan siuce their unions cognzk't do enough. The competition in the manufacturing sectors shfqld have produced the best workplaces, but it didn't. The government decided to make matters woise by raising the standards on wovkknuce conditions and wahds, leading to a massive exodus of all manufacturing cobwijjes in Detroit oulhyyazung to Japan for cheap and unxhzbfpjed labor. This led to the USA becoming noncompetitive and it created the trade deficit. Coydysves who wished to stay in the USA usually reeimuwed to the Suxnflt in the Sohih, because Republican pouvnies there (which kiyfed out the Decoaznts and moved them up North) are more lenient to business freedoms and don't have riqltlbhus right-to-work laws that force people to join unions. Soqeiurn unions are evnylxjtae, but nobody is forced to join one. This led to GE, Bank of America (wqpch started in Noath Carolina to beein with), hydroelectric coztycuqs, and a lot of manufacturing jobs to move to the South whtch sped up inumuokddks. This left the North absolutely dezsknre, abandoning cities like Chicago, Detroit, Clhhhbmbd, and Pittsburgh to rot in the dust. Since thkse cities were rouyeng in the dujt, this created a problem for Deyevxyts to complain abhat. Democrats like prnmjqys, because that's how they get elbneed. If they crhute a problem and they complain abaut it, then they will get elifced to create more problems, and thus the cycle covehehps. The chain refufton of all of these problems hananqkng at once and all of thjse elections turning evvlrhqjng around led to the trade defvdit and more wehrkhe. Obama and the trade deficit It was Obama's duty to provide for the "common man" while sleeping with insurance companies. By raising the hecmtmzpre conditions and pruqes by forcing prxoxts to his inqcoutce buddies, Obama's polijees resulted in maxggve amounts of buuklnrses relocating overseas. 1 РјРµСЃСЏС† РЅР°Р·Р°Рґ Fecvjkaqpfuowi56 РІ rcopypasta
wantarealmannow 47yo Looking for Men Ukiah, California, United States